ارزیابی و پهنه‌بندی فضاهای بی‌دفاع شهری منطقه‌ یک تبریز

نوع مقاله : مقاله مستخرج از پایان نامه

نویسنده

دکتری تخصصی، گروه جغرافیا و برنامه‌ریزی شهری، دانشکده علوم انسانی، دانشگاه زنجان، زنجان، ایران.

چکیده
فضاهای بی‌دفاع شهری از مهمترین عواملی هستند که با ایجاد فرصت‌های بروز رفتارهای بزهکارانه در بافت‌های شهری، امنیت روانی و اجتماعی شهروندان را به مخاطره می‎‌اندازند و به دلیل ویژگی‌های کالبدی و اجتماعی نامطلوب، کیفیت و چگونگی رفتار، حضور و زندگی شهروندان در محیط شهر را تحت تأثیر قرار می‌دهند. این پژوهش درپی ارزیابی و پهنه‌بندی فضاهای بی‌دفاع شهری منطقه یک تبریز بوده و به لحاظ کارکرد، بنیادی و به لحاظ هدف، اکتشافی و کاربردی و بر مبنای داده‌های اسنادی و میدانی و ترکیبی از مطالعات کمی و کیفی می‌باشد. جامعه آماری، فضای کالبدی محلات منطقه یک شهر تبریز بوده و داده‌های به‌دست آمده توسط مولفه‌های موثر در ایجاد فضاهای بی‌دفاع به کمک نرم‌افزارهای سیستم اطلاعات جغرافیایی تجزیه و تحلیل شده و با استفاده از روش‌های وزن‌دهی، همپوشانی نهایی لایه‌ها برای پهنه‌بندی محلات از نظر وجود فضاهای بی‌دفاع انجام شده است. یافته‏ها نشان می‏دهد محلات ولیعصر و گلکار به ترتیب دارای کمترین فضاهای بی‌دفاع و مالازینال، سیلاب قوشخانه، پل‌سنگی، یوسف‌آباد و ایده‌لو به ترتیب بی‌دفاع‌ترین نقاط می‌باشند و با پیشروی از نواحی شرقی به سمت مرزهای غربی منطقه و با کاهش کیفیت محلات، فضاهای بی‌دفاع افزایش یافته و آسیب‌پذیری‌های اجتماعی-کالبدی بیشتر می‌شود، بنابراین نورپردازی و روشنایی نامناسب، زمین‌های بایر و مخروبه، پوشش گیاهی و فضاهای سبز متراکم، معابر بن‌بست، کم‌عرض و معابر ال و یو شکل از مهم‌ترین متغیرهای موثر در ایجاد فضاهای بی‌دفاع شهری هستند، در چنین شرایطی ضعف نظارت و رویت‌پذیری، خلوتی و تاریکی، کیفیت نامناسب فضاها و آشفتگی و فرسودگی بافت‌ها منجر به کاهش امنیت اجتماعی می‌شود.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله English

Evaluation and zoning of defenseless urban spaces in region 1 of Tabriz city

نویسنده English

Amir Kashani Asl
Ph.d, Department of Geography and Urban Planning, Faculty of Humanities, University of Zanjan, Zanjan, Iran
چکیده English

Vulnerable urban spaces are among the spaces that endanger citizens' psychological and social security by creating conditions for the formation and occurrence of criminal behaviors due to inappropriate physical and social characteristics. While dealing with related concepts and definitions, this research seeks to evaluate and zone defenseless urban spaces in region 1 of Tabriz. The type of exploration of this mixed method research is functional, fundamental, and in terms of purpose, the research uses exploratory and applied methods, and is based on documentary and field data.The statistical population of the study includes the physical space of neighborhoods in region 1 of Tabriz. The data obtained by the effective components in creating defenseless spaces are analyzed using of GIS software and weighting methods; the final overlap of layers is used to zoning neighborhoods in terms of defenseless spaces. The findings show that Valiasr and Golkar neighborhoods have the least defenseless spaces, and Mallazeinal, Seylab Qoshkhaneh, Baghmishe Ghadim, Polsangi, Yousefabad, and Idelou neighborhoods have the least defenseless areas in the study area, respectively. In addition, as we move from the eastern areas to the western borders of the region, defenseless spaces increase, their quality decreases, and socio-physical vulnerabilities and social security of citizens are more affected. Inadequate lighting , barren and ruined landscapes, vegetation and dense green spaces, dead-end passages, narrow passages, and L-shaped U-shaped passages are the most important variables that affect the creation of defenseless urban spaces.The effects of these variables include poor monitoring and visibility, loneliness and darkness, poor quality of spaces and confusion, and burnout of tissues, resulting in reduced social security

کلیدواژه‌ها English

urban spaces
defenseless space
security
crime
Tabriz city
1.       Arabi, M., Saberi Naseri, T., & Jahdi, R. (2020). Use all generation of crime prevention through environmental design (CPTED) for design urban historical fabric (Case Study: The central area of Tehran Metropolis Eastern Oudlajan). Journal of Ain Shams Engineering, 11(2), 519-553. 10.1016/j.asej.2019.11.003
2.       Auyero, J., & Berti, M.F. (2015). In Harm's Way (The Dynamics of Urban Violence). Princeton University Press.
3.       Bayat, B. (2009). Sociological Expression of Feeling of Security Among Residents of Tehran (Emphasizing Media Attention and Social Capital). Journal of Nameh-Ye Olum-E Ejtemai, 16(35), 115-132. [in Persian]
4.       Costamagna, F., Lind, R., & Stjernström, O. (2019). Livability of urban public spaces in northern Swedish cities: The case of Umeå. Journal of Planning Practice & Research, 34(12), 131–148. 10.1080/02697459.2018.1548215
5.       Cozens, P. (2008). Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design in Western Australia: Planningfor Sustainabale Urban Futures, Department of Urban and Regional Planning. Curtin University of Technology, Western Australia.
6.       Delavar, A., Ahmadvand, A., & Rezaee, A. (2008). Psychometric Characteristics of Feeling Security Scale (TFSS) for Tehran Population. Journal of Clinical Psychology and Personality6(1), 49-60. 20.1001.1.23452188.1387.6.1.5.6 [in Persian]
7.       Ghalambor Dezfooly, R., & Mohammadi, S. (2015). Urban spaces defensless distribution analysis using GIS (Case Study: new city of Paradis). Journal of police Geography, 3(11), 1-24. [in Persian]
8.       Ghlich, M., & Amari, H. (2013). An Introduction to the Undefended Urban Space. Tehran: Tisa Publications. [in Persian]  
9.       Hakimi, H., Teymuri, I., & Sadigh zangbar, sh. (2022). The Study of Social Security Sense of Tabriz Citizenship's in Informal Settlements. Journal of Order & Security Research, 14(4), 117-144. [in Persian]
10.    Kashani Asl, A. (2022). Dynamics of urban defenseless spaces (Case Study: District One in Tabriz City). PhD thesis, University of Zanjan, Zanjan. [in Persian]
11.    Kashani Asl, A., Allahgholi Tabar Nesheli, F., & Afzali Grouh, Z. (2019). Improvement of defenseless urban spaces with a dynamic approach to spaces, First national quality conference in urban and architectural spaces, Zanjan. [in Persian]
12.    Laidler, A. J. (2009). Crimonology. University of Hong Kong. 2nd edition.
13.    Lang, J. (2004). The Creation of Architectural Theory. Translated by: Alireza Ainifar, Third Edition, Tehran: Tehran University Press. [in Persian]
14.    Lotfi, S., Annamoradnejad, R. B., & Vahedi, H. (2015). Evaluation of Physical Components of Public Spaces and their Impact on Social Security of Babolsar Citizens. Journal of Strategic Research on Social Problems4(1), 131-152. 20.1001.1.23221453.1394.4.1.9.7 [in Persian]
15.    Madanipour, A. (2013). Urban Space Design: A Perspective on a Socio-Spatial Process. Translated by Farhad Mortezaei, Tehran: Pardazah and Urban Planning Company Publications. [in Persian]
16.    Mair, J. S., & Mair, M. (2003). Violence prevention and control through environmental modifications. Journal of Annual Review of Public Health. 24(8), 209-225. 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.24.100901.140826
17.    Mansoori, E., Majedi, H., & Haji Ahmadi, A. (2011). Redefinition Of Urban Space (Case Study: Between Vali Asr Square and Char Rah Vali Asr). Journal of Urban Management, 9(27), 263-283. [in Persian]
18.    Mohammadi, A., & Arzhangi, H. (2020). Analysis of the relationship between defenseless spaces and environmental variables using the GIS (Case study: Region 3 of Ardabil). Journal of Quarterly of Order & Security Guards13(4), 1-32. [in Persian]
19.    Pedrazzini, Y., Vincent-Geslin, S., & Thorer A. (2014). Violence of Urbanization, Poor Neighborhoods and Large-Scale Projects: Lessons from Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Journal of Built Environment, Urban Violence, 40(3), 394-407. 10.2148/benv.40.3.394
20.    Salaripour, A., & Adeli, Z. (2010). Security in urban spaces (case study: Qazvin city). First National Urban Landscape Conference, National Urban Landscape Conference, Tehran: Culture and Art Research Institute. [in Persian]
21.    Salaripour, A., & Seyfreyhani, Z. (2021). Strategies for identifying and classifying defenseless and crime-prone spaces to improve the security of Rasht city, National Conference on Architecture, Civil Engineering, Urban Development and Horizons of Islamic Art in the Second Step Statement of the Revolution papers, Tabriz. [in Persian]
22.    Salimi, F., Ghaemi, I., Adeli, N., & Eghbal Moghaddam, R. (2017). Evaluating the Design of Akhoond District Center in Qazvin; Improving Security Level, Citing CPTED Approach. Journal of Motaleate Shahri, 6(21), 29-38. [in Persian]
23.    Sarvar, H., Kashani Asl, A., Salahi Sarikhan Biglou, V., & Lalepour, M. (2015). Evaluation of the Capabilities of Development of Ahar city of Iran, with an Emphasis on the Role of Road Transportation Network. Journal of Civil Engineering and Urbanism, 5 (2), 108-115.
24.    Sheikh Veysi, Y., Khosroshahi, H. S., & Mohseni, R. A. (2020). Investigating the relationship between defenseless urban spaces and violent behaviors in Tehran. Journal of National Security, 10(36), 349-376. 20.1001.1.33292538.1399.10.36.11.2 [in Persian]
25.    Sypion-Dutkowska, N., & Leitner, M. (2017). Land use influencing the spatial distribution of urban crime: A case study of Szczecin, Poland. Journal of Geo-Information, 6(3), 74. 10.3390/ijgi6030074
26.    Vilalta Carlos, J. (2012). Fear of crime and home security systems. Journal of Police Practice and Research,13(2), 4-14. 10.1080/15614263.2011.607651
27.    Wickremasinghe, H. T., & Kaluthanthri, P. C. (2021). Spatial distribution of crimes in urban areas. An insight from Sri Lanka.