دلبستگی به مکان و تأثیر آن بر ادراک خطر سیلاب و رفتار پیشگیرانه: مقایسه میان‌فرهنگی بین ایتالیا (,ویبو والنتیا) و ایران (بابل)

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشگاه تبریز، دانشکده عمران، گروه معماری

2 دانشگاه مراغه، دانشکده انسانی، گروه جغرافیا و برنامه ریزی شهری

چکیده
با تغییرات سریع اقلیمی، خطر مخاطرات محیطی، از جمله سیل‌های ناگهانی و ویرانگر، به‌شدت افزایش یافته است. تغییرات آب‌وهوایی جهانی باعث ناپایداری الگوهای بارندگی، افزایش شدت طوفان‌ها و بالا رفتن سطح آب رودخانه‌ها شده که در نهایت منجر به بروز سیلاب‌های گسترده در مناطق مختلف می‌شود.در کنار عوامل طبیعی، نحوه واکنش جوامع انسانی به این خطرات نقش مهمی در میزان آسیب‌پذیری آن‌ها دارد. مفاهیم روان‌شناختی مانند دلبستگی به مکان به‌عنوان یکی از عوامل کلیدی در شکل‌گیری ارتباطات انسان و محیط مطرح می‌شوند. دلبستگی شامل پیوندهای عاطفی، شناختی و تجربی افراد با مکان زندگی‌شان است و می‌تواند بر میزان ادراک خطر و اقدامات پیشگیرانه تأثیرگذار باشد. پژوهش حاضر این فرضیه را مطرح می‌کند که رابطه بین دلبستگی به مکان، ادراک خطر محیطی و رفتار پیشگیرانه در کشورهای مختلف، بسته به زمینه‌های فرهنگی، متفاوت است. این مطالعه دو شهر ویبو والنتیا (ایتالیا) و بابل (ایران) را که احتمال وقوع سیل در آن‌ها بسیار بالا است، مقایسه کرده است. نتایج حاکی از آن است که افراد با دلبستگی بالا به مکان، ادراک بیشتری از خطر دارند و تمایل بیشتری به اتخاذ رفتارهای پیشگیرانه نشان می‌دهند. همچنین تأثیر دلبستگی به مکان بر ادراک خطر و رفتار پیشگیرانه در بابل بیشتر از ویبو والنتیا بود. پژوهش حاضر بر اهمیت عوامل روان‌شناختی در مدیریت مخاطرات محیطی تأکید دارد و نشان می‌دهد که توجه به دلبستگی به مکان می‌تواند به سیاست‌گذاری‌های مؤثرتر جهت کاهش خسارات ناشی از بلایای طبیعی کمک کند. با بررسی تفاوت‌های فرهنگی، نتایج این مطالعه می‌تواند در تدوین برنامه‌های مدیریت بحران بسیار مفید و کاربردی باشد.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله English

Place Attachment and Its Impact on Flood Risk Perception and Preventive Behavior: A Cross-Cultural Comparison of Vibo Valentia (Italy) and Babol (Iran)

نویسندگان English

Leila Rahimi 1
Hadis Bordbar 2
Sepideh Pouri 1
1 Tabriz University, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Department of Architecture
2 Maragheh of University , Faculty of Humanities, Department of Geography and Urban Planning
چکیده English

Due to rapid climate change, the risk of environmental hazards such as flooding has increased considerably. On the other hand, psychological concepts such as place attachment not only govern human-environment relationships, but also influence the extent of damage caused by environmental hazards through risk perception and preventive behavior. Given the above problem, the present research hypothesizes that the relationship between place attachment, environmental risk perception, and preventive behavior varies across countries with different cultural contexts. A cross-cultural comparison was made between two cities where flooding is very likely, namely Vibo Valentia (Italy) and Babol (Iran). To investigate the study's objectives, a three-way interaction moderation multiple regression analysis was used. The results of the study showed that a high degree of place attachment makes people more likely to engage in risk perception and preventive behavior. It also showed that the influence of place attachment on environmental risk perception and preventive behavior is greater in Babol than in Italy.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Risk Perception
Place Attachment
Preventive Behavior
Babol
Vibo Valentina
1.       Abbaszadeh, M., BaniFatemeh, H., Alizadeh, M., & Alavi, L. (2015). The intervention effect of environmental responsible attitude on the relationship between spatial attachment and environmental responsible behavior. Journal of Applied Sociology Quarterly, 2(62), 61–80.
2.       Adger, W. N., Barnett, J., Brown, K., Marshall, N., & O’brien, K. (2013). Cultural dimensions of climate change impacts and adaptation. Nature Climate Change, 3, 112–117. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1666
3.       Baan, P. J. A., & Klijn, F. (2004). Safety approach for flooding: Improving preparedness? [In Dutch]. H2O, 36(18), 17–18.
4.       Baan, P. J. A., & Klijn, F. (2010). Flood risk perception and implications for flood risk management in the Netherlands. Journal of River Basin Management, 2(2), 113–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/15715124.2004.9635226
5.       Baghanam, A. H., Eslahi, M., Sheikhbabaei, A., & Seifi, A. J. (2020). Assessing the impact of climate change over the northwest of Iran: An overview of statistical downscaling methods. Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 139(1–2), 389–402. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-020-03271-8
6.       Bernardo, F. (2013). Impact of place attachment on risk perception: Exploring the multidimensionality of risk and its magnitude. Estudios de Psicología, 34(3), 323–329. https://doi.org/10.1174/021093913808349253
7.       Bihari, M., & Ryan, R. (2012). Influence of social capital on community preparedness for wildfires. Landscape and Urban Planning, 106(3), 253–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.03.011
8.       Bird, D. K., Gísladóttir, G., & Dominey-Howes, D. (2011). Different communities, different perspectives: Issues affecting residents’ response to a volcanic eruption in southern Iceland. Bulletin of Volcanology, 73, 1209–1227. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00445-011-0464-1
9.       Bonaiuto, M., Alves, S., De Dominicis, S., & Petruccelli, I. (2016). Place attachment and natural hazard risk: Research review and agenda. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 48, 33–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2016.07.007
10.    Birkholz, S., Muro, M., Jeffrey, P., & Smith, H. M. (2014). Rethinking the relationship between flood risk perception and flood management. Science of the Total Environment, 478, 12–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.01.061
11.    Bonnes, M., Lee, T., & Bonaiuto, M. (2003). Psychological theories for environmental issues. Ashgate.
12.    Breakwell, G. M. (2007). The psychology of risk. Cambridge University Press.
13.    Brown, B., & Perkins, P. (1992). Disruption in place attachment. In I. Altman & S. Low (Eds.), Place attachment (pp. 279–304). Plenum Press.
14.    Burningham, K., & Thrush, D. (2004). Pollution concerns in context: A comparison of local perceptions of the risks associated with living close to a road and a chemical factory. Risk Research, 7, 213–232. https://doi.org/10.1080/1366987042000158721
15.    Casakin, H., Hernandez, B., & Ruiz, C. (2015). Place attachment and place identity in Israeli cities: The influence of city size. Cities, 42, 224–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2014.07.007
16.    Cvetkovich, G., & Earle, T. C. (1992). Environmental hazards and the public. Journal of Social Issues, 48(4), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1992.tb01942.x
17.    Cuba, L., & Hummon, D. M. (1993). A place to call home: Identification with dwelling, community, and region. Sociological Quarterly, 34, 111–131. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-8525.1993.tb00133.x
18.    Dandy, J., Horwitz, P., Campbell, R., Drake, D., & Leviston, Z. (2019). Leaving home: Place attachment and decisions to move in the face of environmental change. Regional Environmental Change, 19, 615–620. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-019-01463-1
19.    Daryanto, A., & Song, Z. (2021). A meta-analysis of the relationship between place attachment and pro-environmental behaviour. Journal of Business Research, 123, 208–219.
20.    De Dominicis, S., Crano, W. D., Ganucci Cancellieri, U., Mosco, B., Bonnes, M., Hohman, Z., & Bonaiuto, M. (2014). Vested interest and environmental risk communication: Improving willingness to cope with impending disasters. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 44(5), 364–374.
21.    De Dominicis, S., Fornara, F., Ganucci Cancellieri, U., Twigger-Ross, C., & Bonaiuto, M. (2015). We are at risk, and so what? Place attachment, environmental risk perceptions and preventive coping behaviours. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 43, 66–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.05.010
22.    Devine-Wright, P. (2011). Place attachment and public acceptance of renewable energy: A tidal energy case study. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 31(4), 336–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2011.07.001
23.    Devine-Wright, P. (2014). Dynamics of place attachment in a climate changed world. In L. C. Manzo & P. Devine-Wright (Eds.), Place attachment: Advances in theory, methods and applications (pp. 165–177). Routledge.
24.    Domingues, R. B., de Jesus, S. N., & Ferreira, Ó. (2021). Place attachment, risk perception, and preparedness in a population exposed to coastal hazards: A case study in Faro Beach, southern Portugal. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 60, 102288.
25.    Domingues, R., Costas, S., Neves de Jesus, S., & Ferreira, Ó. (2017). Sense of place, risk perceptions and preparedness of a coastal population at risk: The case of Faro Beach. Journal of Spatial and Organizational Dynamics, 5(3), 163–175.
26.    Dumas, P., Hallegatte, S., Quintana-Seguì, P., & Martin, E. (2013). The influence of climate change on flood risks in France—First estimates and uncertainty analysis. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 13, 809–821. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-13-809-2013
27.    Flinterman, M. H., Glasius, A. T. F., & Van Konijnenburg, P. G. (2003). The perception of flood risks [In Dutch]. Bouwdienst Rijkswaterstaat.
28.    Gierlach, E., Belsher, B. E., & Beutler, L. E. (2010). Crosscultural differences in risk perceptions of disasters. Risk Analysis, 30(10), 1539–1549.
29.    Groulx, M., Lewis, J., Lemieux, C., & Dawson, J. (2014). Place-based climate change adaptation: A critical case study of climate change messaging and collective action in Churchill, Manitoba. Landscape and Urban Planning, 132, 136–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.09.002
30.    Hallman, W. K., & Wandersman, A. (1992). Attribution of responsibility and individual and collective coping with environmental threats. Journal of Social Issues, 48(4), 101–118. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1992.tb01947.x
31.    Harclerode, M. A., Lal, P., Vedwan, N., Wolde, B., & Miller, M. E. (2016). Evaluation of the role of risk perception in stakeholder engagement to prevent lead exposure in an urban setting. Journal of Environmental Management, 184, 132–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.07.045
32.    Harries, T., & Penning-Rowsell, E. (2012). Victim pressure, institutional inertia and climate change adaptation: The case of flood risk. Global Environmental Change, 21(1), 188–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.09.002
33.    Hummon, D. M. (1992). Community attachment: Local sentiment and sense of place. In I. Altman & S. M. Low (Eds.), Place attachment (pp. 253–278). Plenum Press.
34.    Hung, H. C., Yang, C. Y., Chien, C. Y., & Liu, Y. C. (2016). Building resilience: Mainstreaming community participation into integrated assessment of resilience to climatic hazards in metropolitan land use management. Land Use Policy, 50, 48–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.08.029
35.    Johnson, I. M., Siegel, J. T., & Crano, W. D. (2012). Expanding the reach of vested interest in predicting attitude-consistent behavior. Social Influence, 9(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/15534510.2012.738243
36.    Kellens, W., Zaalberg, R., Neutens, T., Vanneuville, W., & De Maeyer, P. (2011). An analysis of the public perception of flood risk on the Belgian coast. Risk Analysis, 31(7), 1055–1068. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2010.01571.x
37.    Knez, I. (2005). Attachment and identity as related to a place and its perceived climate. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 25(2), 207–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2005.03.003
38.    Lewicka, M. (2011). Place attachment: How far have we come in the last 40 years? Journal of Environmental Psychology, 31(3), 207–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.10.001
39.    Linden, S. (2014). On the relationship between personal experiences, affect and risk perception: The case of climate change. European Journal of Social Psychology, 44(5), 430–440. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2008
40.    Low, S., & Altman, I. (1992). Place attachment: A conceptual inquiry. In I. Altman & S. Low (Eds.), Place attachment (pp. 1–12). Plenum Press.
41.    Miller, C. H., Adame, B. J., & Moore, S. D. (2013). Vested interest theory and disaster preparedness. Disasters, 37(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7717.2012.01290.x
42.    O'Brien, K. L. (2016). Climate change and social transformations: Is it time for a quantum leap? Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 7(5), 618–626. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.413
43.    O'Sullivan, J. J., Bradford, R. A., Bonaiuto, M., De Dominicis, S., Rotko, P., & Aaltonen, J. (2012). Enhancing flood resilience through improved risk communications. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 12, 2271–2282. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-12-2271-2012
44.    Park, J. (2017). A unified approach to the understanding of decision under risk: Implications for diversity management [Doctoral dissertation, University of Eastern Finland].
45.    Penning-Rowsell, E. (2003). Implementing flood mitigation and protection: Constraints, limitations, power and ‘reality’. In Dealing with flood risk: Proceedings of an interdisciplinary seminar on the regional implications of modern flood management (Vol. 1). Delft Hydraulics Select Series.
46.    Proshansky, H. M. (1978). The city and self-identity. Environment and Behavior, 10(2), 147–169. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916578102002
47.    Raaijmakers, R., Krywkow, J. R., & Van der Veen, A. (2008). Flood risk perceptions and spatial multi-criteria analysis: An exploratory research for hazard mitigation. Natural Hazards, 46(3), 307–322. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-007-9189-z
48.    Reho, M., Veneziani, G., Ciacchella, C., Gennaro, A., Salvatore, S., & Lai, C. (2024). The influence of cultural worldviews on the association between wildfire risk perception and preventive behaviors. Psychology Hub, 41(2).
49.    Rohrmann, B. (2013). Risk perception of different societal groups: Australian findings and cross-national comparison. Australian Psychologist, 46(3), 150–163. https://doi.org/10.1080/00049539408259490
50.    Sado-Inamura, Y., & Fukushi, K. (2019). Empirical analysis of flood risk perception using historical data in Tokyo. Land Use Policy, 82, 13–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.11.031
51.    Santoro, S., Pluchinotta, I., Pagano, A., Pengal, P., Cokan, B., & Giordano, R. (2019). Assessing stakeholders’ risk perception to promote Nature Based Solutions as flood protection strategies: The case of the Glinščica river (Slovenia). Science of the Total Environment, 655, 188–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.11.116
52.    Schultz, P. W., Milfont, T. L., Chance, R. C., Tronu, G., Luís, S., Ando, K., Rasool, F., Roose, P. L., Ogunbode, C. A., Castro, J., & Gouveia, V. V. (2014). Cross-cultural evidence for spatial bias in beliefs about the severity of environmental problems. Environment and Behavior, 46(3), 267–302. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916512458579
53.    Shao, W., Xian, S., Lin, N., Kunreuther, H., Jackson, N., & Goidel, K. (2017). Understanding the effects of past flood events and perceived and estimated flood risks on individuals’ voluntary flood insurance purchase behavior. Water Research, 108, 391–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2016.11.021
54.    Sheikhbabaei, A., Hosseini Baghanam, A., Zarghami, M., Pouri, S., & Hassanzadeh, E. (2022). System thinking approach toward reclamation of regional water management under changing climate conditions. Sustainability, 14(15), 9411. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14159411
55.    Shumaker, S. A. (1983). Toward a clarification of people-place relationships: A model of attachment to place. Environmental psychology: Directions and perspectives, 2, 19.
56.    Slovic, P. (2000). Convergent validation of risk-taking measures. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 65(1), 68–71. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0048048
57.    Speller, G. M., Lyons, E., & Twigger-Ross, C. (2002). A community in transition: The relationship between spatial change and identity processes. Social Psychological Review, 4(2), 39–58.
58.    Stokols, D. (1981). People in places: A transactional view of settings. In J. Harvey (Ed.), Cognition, social behavior, and the environment (pp. 441–488). Erlbaum.
59.    Terpstra, T., Gutteling, J. M., Geldof, G. D., & Kappe, L. J. (2006). The perception of flood risk and water nuisance. Water Science and Technology, 54(6), 431–439. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2006.573
60.    UNISDR. (2012). United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction. http://www.unisdr.org
61.    Vaske, J. J., & Kobrin, K. C. (2001). Place attachment and environmentally responsible behavior. Journal of Environmental Education, 32(4), 16–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958960109598658
62.    Vlek, C. A. J. (2001). Psychology of risks: Each advantage has its risk. Hypothese, 12, 12–15.
63.    Weber, E. U., & Hsee, C. (1998). Cross-cultural differences in risk perception, but cross-cultural similarities in attitudes towards perceived risk. Management Science, 44(9), 1205–1217.
64.    Wu, T. (2022). Emergency response volunteers’ flood risk perception under climate change and flood hazard and risk maps acceptance behavior: a comparative study between Baden-Württemberg, Germany, and Guangdong, China (Doctoral dissertation, Dissertation, Stuttgart, Universität Stuttgart, 2022).
65.    Xu, D., Qing, C., Deng, X., Yong, Z., Zhou, W., & Ma, Z. (2020). Disaster risk perception, sense of pace, evacuation willingness, and relocation willingness of rural households in earthquake-stricken areas: Evidence from Sichuan Province, China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(2), 602. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17020602
66.    Zhang, Y., Zhang, H. L., Zhang, J., & Cheng, S. (2014). Predicting residents’ pro-environmental behaviors at tourist sites: The role of awareness of disaster’s consequences, values, and place attachment. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 40, 131–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.06.001