جغرافیا و پژوهش های شهری

فراتحلیل پژوهش‌های حکمرانی خوب شهری در جهان

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

ایرج تیموری 1
فریدون بابائی اقدم 1
علی اسکوئی ارس 2
پریناز بادامچی زاده 3
حدیث بردبار 4

1 گروه برنامه ‏ریزی شهری و منطقه ‏ای، دانشکده برنامه‏ ریزی و علوم محیطی، دانشگاه تبریز، تبریز، ایران

2 گروه برنامه‏ ریزی شهری و منطق ه‏ای، دانشکده برنامه ‏ریزی و علوم محیطی، دانشگاه تبریز، تبریز، ایران

3 گروه برنامه ریزی شهری و منطقه ای، دانشکده برنامه ریزی و علوم محیطی، دانشگاه تبریز، تبریز، ایران

4 دکتری تخصصی، گروه جغرافیا و برنامه ریزی شهری، دانشکده انسانی، دانشگاه مراغه، مراغه، ایران.

https://doi.org/10.22130/gur.2026.2087097.1042
چکیده
این مطالعه با هدف تحلیل علم‌سنجی و بررسی روندهای پژوهشی در حوزه حکمروایی خوب شهری طی دوره زمانی ۲۰۰۰ تا ۲۰۲۵ انجام شده است. داده‌های کتاب‌شناختی مرتبط با این حوزه از پایگاه معتبر Web of Science استخراج گردید. استراتژی جستجو بر اساس کلیدواژه‌های تخصصی در عنوان، چکیده و کلیدواژه‌ها طراحی شد. پس از اعمال معیارهای ورود و خروج، در مجموع ۱۳۵۷ مقاله برای تحلیل نهایی انتخاب گردید. داده‌ها پس از پالایش و بازبینی با بهره‌گیری از روش‌های علم‌سنجی، تحلیل شبکه‌های همکاری علمی و محیط نرم‌افزار VOSviewer تحلیل شدند. این رویکرد امکان شناسایی موضوعات محوری، خوشه‌بندی موضوعی و الگوهای همکاری پژوهشی را فراهم کرد. تحلیل داده‌ها نشان داد که مطالعات حکمروایی خوب شهری عمدتاً بر محورهایی همچون حکمروایی شهری، پایداری، تاب‌آوری، عدالت اجتماعی و فناوری‌های هوشمند متمرکز بوده‌اند. خوشه‌بندی موضوعی شش حوزه اصلی را شناسایی کرد: حکمروایی و مدیریت شهری، پایداری و توسعه شهری، مشارکت شهروندان، عدالت اجتماعی، فناوری و هوشمندسازی و حوزه‌های نوظهور. تحلیل شبکه‌های هم‌نویسندگی نشان داد ساختار همکاری علمی در این حوزه متمرکز و ناهمگون است؛ چند پژوهشگر کلیدی نقش پل و شتاب‌دهنده انتشار دانش را ایفا می‌کنند. این پژوهش با ارائه تصویری جامع از روندهای تحقیقاتی و شبکه‌های همکاری علمی، شکاف‌های پژوهشی کلیدی را مشخص کرد. از جمله شکاف‌های عمده می‌توان به نیاز به مدل‌های تلفیقی عدالت و پایداری، تقویت سازوکارهای عملیاتی مشارکت شهروندی و بومی‌سازی راهبردهای وارداتی از بافت‌های غربی اشاره کرد. بر اساس یافته‌ها، پژوهش‌های آتی باید بر توسعه چارچوب‌های ترکیبی عدالت تاب‌آوری متمرکز شوند و سیاست‌گذاران شهری می‌توانند از الگوهای شبکه‌های همکاری علمی برای کاهش عدم تقارن دانشی میان کشورها استفاده کنند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

حکمروایی خوب شهری
علم ‏سنجی
VOSviewer
شبکه‏ های همکاری علمی

عنوان مقاله English

A Meta-Analysis of Global Research on Good Urban Governance

نویسندگان English

Iraj Teimouri 1
Fereidoun Babaei Aghdam 1
Ali Oskouee Aras 2
Parinaz Badamchizadeh 3
Hadis Bordbar 4
1 Department of Urban and Regional Planning, Faculty of Planning and Environmental Sciences, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran
2 Department of Urban and Regional Planning, Faculty of Planning and Environmental Sciences, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran
3 Department of Urban and Regional Planning, Faculty of Planning and Environmental Sciences, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran
4 PhD, Department of Geography and Urban Planning, Faculty of Humanities, University of Maragheh, Maragheh, Iran.
چکیده English

This study was conducted with the aim of scientometric analysis and investigation of research trends in Good Urban Governance from 2000 to 2025. Bibliographic data were extracted from the Web of Science database. The search strategy was designed based on specialized keywords in titles, abstracts, and keywords. After applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, 1,357 articles were selected for final analysis. The data were purified, validated, and analyzed using scientometric methods, scientific collaboration network analysis, and VOSviewer software. This approach enabled the identification of core topics, thematic clustering, and research collaboration patterns. Data analysis revealed that studies on Good Urban Governance have primarily focused on urban governance, sustainability, resilience, social justice, and smart technologies. Thematic clustering identified six main research areas: governance and urban management, sustainability and urban development, citizen participation, social justice, technology and smartization, and emerging domains. Co-authorship network analysis showed that scientific collaboration in this field is centralized and heterogeneous; a few key researchers act as bridges and accelerators of knowledge diffusion. These findings indicate the growth of scientific collaborations at international and domestic levels, but also highlight the risk of over-reliance on a few central nodes. By presenting a comprehensive overview of research trends and scientific collaboration networks, this study identified key research gaps. Major gaps include the need for integrated models of justice and sustainability, strengthening operational mechanisms of citizen participation, and localizing strategies imported from Western contexts for developing countries. Based on the findings, future research should focus on developing hybrid justice-resilience frameworks. Urban policymakers can utilize the collaboration network patterns identified to reduce knowledge asymmetry between developed and developing countries.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Good Urban Governance
Scientometrics
VOSviewer
Scientific Collaboration Networks
1.       Agherian, E., Nabatinejad, M., & Zackery, A. (2024). Development of a Model for Urban Governance Based on Citizen Participation. Journal of Strategic Research on Social Problems, 13(2), 47-68. doi: 10.22108/srspi.2024.139470.1951 [In Persian]
2.       Akhtar, K., & Pirzad, S. (2014). SWOT analysis of agriculture sector of Pakistan. Journal of Economics and Sustainble Development, 15(11), 127-133. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/234646426.pdf
3.       Asghari, M., Karkehbadi, Z., & Arghan A. (2025). The role of women in the good governance of Semnan in the corona and post-corona era. Journal of jgs, 25(78), 488-507. doi:10.61186/jgs.25.78.6 [In Persian]
4.       Askarizadeh, S., Zarabi, A., & Taghvaei, M. (2019). The Status of Indicators of Good Urban Governance in Arak City, Iran, in the Viewpoints of Urban Managers and Citizens. Journal of GeoRes, 34(4), 595-605. https://georesearch.ir/article-1-794-fa.html [In Persian]
5.       Azimi, M., Hosainzadeh Dalir, K., & Azar, A. (2022). Assessing the Challenges of Promoting Urban Governance with a Future Studies Approach the Case Study of Mianeh City. Journal of Sustainable city, 5(2), 93-114. doi: 10.22034/jsc.2021.298787.1523 [In Persian]
6.       Azizi, M., Darskhan, R., & Pourmohammad, M.R. (2020). Investigating the role of structural-strategic plans in the realization of the idea of good urban governance in Tehran's 22 District. Journal of Human Geography Research, 52(4), 1357-1371. doi: 10.22059/jhgr.2019.271593.1007829 [In Persian]
7.       Baud, I. (2021). The urban governance configuration: A conceptual framework. Journal of Geographical, 187(3), 235-249. https://doi.org/10.1111/gec3.12562
8.       Besancenot, D., Huynh, K., & Serranito, F. (2017). Co-authorship and research productivity in economics: Assessing the assortative matching hypothesis. Journal of Economic Modelling, 66(3), 61–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2017.05.018
9.       Biswas, R. (2019). A good-governance framework for urban management. Journal of Sustainable Cities and Society, 49(3), 13-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2019.1328
10.    Bródka, P., Saganowski, S., & Kazienko, P. (2013). GED: the method for group evolution discovery in social networks. Journal of Social Network Analysis and Mining, 3(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13278-012-0058-8
11.    Conceptual framework. (2023). Public Health.1006-1012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2023.05.004
12.    Davidson, K., Gleeson, B., Coenen, L., & Acuto, M. (2019). Reconfiguring urban governance in an age of rising city networks: A research agenda. Journal of Urban Studies, 56(16), 3540–3555. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098018816010
13.    Davidson, M., et al. (2019). Global networks and urban governance. Journal of Urban Studies, 56(14), 2931-2947. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098019833552
14.    Duhas, P. (2001). Decentralization and local governance. Journal of Public Administration Review, 61(3), 275-286. https://doi.org/10.1111/0033-3352.00037
15.    Elander, I. (2002). Partnerships and urban governance. Journal of International Social Science, 54(172), 191–204. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2451.00371
16.    Esmaeilzadeh, H., Koozagar, L.A., Alian, M., & Adinehvand, A.A. (2016). Meta-analysis on urban governance researches in Iran.  Journal of Spatial Planning and Geomatics, 20(2), 1-40. https://hsmsp.modares.ac.ir/article_14512.html?lang=fa [In Persian]
17.    Esmailpour, N. (2021). The model of good sustainable urban governance based on participatory approaches. Journal of Urban Management and Engineering Studies, 1(2), 249-280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijumes.2021.249506
18.    Ettorre, B., Clemente, M., Daldanise, G., & Giovene Di Girasole, E. (2023). Co-Planning Port–City 2030: The InterACT Approach as a Booster for Port–City Sustainable Development. Journal of Sustainability, 15(21), 156-170. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152115641
19.    Frantzeskaki, N. (2022). Bringing Transition Management to Cities: Building Skills for Transformative Urban Governance. Journal of Sustainability, 14(2), 65-85. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14020650
20.    Ghalandarian, I., & Soltani, S. (2023). A meta-study of scientific research in the field of urban governance in Iran. Journal of Urban and Rural Management, 21(4), 41-53. http://ijurm.imo.org.ir/article-1-3316-fa.html [In Persian]
21.    Ghosh Mitra, S., Chandra, A., & Ramaprasad, A. (2024). The Ontology of Urban Governance: A Framework for Pathways to Sustainable Urban Transition. Journal of Urban Science, 8(2), 38-50. https://doi.org/10.3390/urbansci8020038
22.    Goldsmith, S., & Yang, J. (2025). AI and the transformation of accountability and discretion in urban governance. Journal of arXiv preprint, 2(2), 1-12. https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.13101
23.    Häikiö, L. (2007). Expertise, Representation and the Common Good: Grounds for Legitimacy in the Urban Governance Network. Journal of Urban Studies, 44(4), 2147–2162. https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980701518982
24.    Hajinejad, A., Paidar, A., & Arshad, H. (2016). An Analysis on the Position of Urban Good Governance and Strategic Planning Case study: Zahedan City. Journal of Geography and Development, 14(42), 63-82. doi: 10.22111/gdij.2016.2344 [In Persian]
25.    Hataminejad, H., Bazr Afkan, SH., Arvin, M. (2017). On the Analysis of the Role of Good Urban Governance Model in Reducing Urban Housing Vulnerability against Earthquake. Journal of Studies of Human Settlements Planning, 12(3), 599-617. https://sanad.iau.ir/Journal/jshsp/Article/1030834 [In Persian]
26.    Hosseinpour, M., Kalantari, M., & Ghalehteimouri, K.J. (2025). Exploring urban future: enhancing good urban governance through scenario planning in Urmia city, Iran. Journal of City Built Enviro, 3(2), 18-25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44213-025-00056-5
27.    Jacques, E. D. A., De Paris, S., Francescatto, M. B., Júnior, A. N., & Nunes, R. F. B. (2024). Smart City Actions Integrated into Urban Planning: Management of Urban Environments by Thematic Areas. Journal of Applied Sciences, 14(8), 33-51. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14083351
28.    Jafarifard, j., Saberi, H., Azani, M., & Khademolhoseiny, A. (2021). The Effect of Good Urban Governance on the Sustainability of Urban Neighborhoods (A Case Study of Kahnouj). Journal of Environmental Based Territorial Planning, 14(53), 109-132. https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.2676783.1400.14.53.6.2 [In Persian]
29.    Jiang, Y., Ritchie, B. W., & Benckendorff, P. (2019). Bibliometric visualisation: an application in tourism crisis and disaster management research. Journal of Current Issues in Tourism, 22(16), 1925–1957. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2017.1408574
30.    Khatam, S., Ahmadi, S. A., & Khatam, M. (2022). Investigating the State of Good urban Governance in Tehran Metropolis. Journal of Research Political Geography, 7(2), 1-24. doi: 10.22067/pg.2021.69157.1027 doi: 10.22067/pg.2021.69157.1027 [In Persian]
31.    Khomejani S., Sarvar R., Amirazodi, T., & Arbabi Sabzvari, A. (2022). Measuring and evaluating the indicators of good urban governance in Tehran metropolis. Journal of JFCV, 3(3), 43-59. https://jvfc.ir/browse.php?a_id=205&sid=1&slc_lang=fa [In Persian]
32.    Kirsop-Taylor, N., Russel, D., & Jensen, A. (2021). Urban governance and policy mixes for nature-based solutions and integrated water policy. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 498–512. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908x.2021.1956309
33.    Kramer, J., et al. (2024). Urban governance arrangements for sustainability and justice. Journal of Urban Transformations, 6(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42854-024-00064-4
34.    Maleki, M. (2017). Survey of Municipalities in the Framework of Good Urban Governance (Case Study: Urban areas of Ilam).  Journal of ilam culture, 17(2), 63-81. https://www.farhangeilam.ir/article_47068.html?lang=en [In Persian]
35.    Maleki, S., Ārvin, M., & Bazrafkan, S. (2019). The role of good urban governance in the realization of the resilient city (A case study of Ahwāz city). Journal of Urban Planning Knowledge, 2(4), 1-18. doi: 10.22124/upk.2019.12195.1162 [In Persian]
36.    Matei, A., & Cocoșatu, M. (2024). Artificial Internet of Things, Sensor-Based Digital Twin Urban Computing Vision Algorithms, and Blockchain Cloud Networks in Sustainable Smart City Administration. Journal of Sustainability, 16(4), 67-79. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16166749
37.    Meshkini, A., & Moazzen, S. (2015). Good Urban Governance Analysis in Cities Sustainability Case Study: Ajabshir City. Journal of Environmental Based Territorial Planning, 8(3), 99-132. https://sanad.iau.ir/Journal/ebtp/Article/988311 [In Persian]
38.    Meshkini, A., Pourmusavi, S.M., & Moazzen, S. (2013). Evaluation of neighborhood management model based on good urban governance indicators (Case study: Evin neighborhood, Tehran). Journal of Urban Studies, 2(3), 31-42. https://urbstudies.uok.ac.ir/article_5564.html?lang=fa [In Persian]
39.    Meyer, N., & Auriacombe, C. (2019). Good Urban Governance and City Resilience: An Afrocentric Approach to Sustainable Development. Journal of Sustainability, 11(3), 55-64. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11195514
40.    Micozzi, N., & Yigitcanlar, T. (2022). Understanding Smart City Policy: Insights from the Strategy Documents of 52 Local Governments. Journal of Sustainability, 14(4), 101-113. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141610164
41.    Minri, T. (2007). Collaborative governance and urban policy. Journal of Urban Sciences, 11(2), 123-136. https://doi.org/10.1080/12265934.2007.9713387
42.    Mohammadi Dehcheshmeh, M., & Arianjad, N. (2025). Demographic Changes and Challenges for Good Urban Governance (Case Study: Ahvaz City). Journal of Geography and Territorial Spatial Arrangement, 15(2), 33-64. doi: 10.22111/gaij.2025.50055.3238 [In Persian]
43.    Mohammadian, S., Ghorbani, M., Malekian, A., Mohammadi, A., & Rahimi, M. (2025). Analysis of the Urban Water Governance Network Structure in Tehran: Identification of Key Actors and Governance Regime. Journal of Natural Resources Governance, 1(4), 389-400. doi: 10.22059/jnrg.2025.102732 [In Persian]
44.    Montazeri, Z., & Mohammadi, M. (2024). Drawing a Knowledge Map of Governance Approach based on Domestic Research.  Journal of Public Policy, 10(1), 207-221. doi: 10.22059/jppolicy.2024.97830 [In Persian]
45.    Moradi M. (2022). Evaluation of Good Urban Governance in Iran - Case Study: Neyshabur City. Journal of CIAUJ, 7(2), 147-161. doi:10.52547/ciauj.7.2.147 [In Persian]
46.    Mousavi, M., Ghaderi, R., Bayramzadeh, N., & Kamel Nia, R. (2024). Investigating the Feasibility of Good Urban Governance with Emphasis on Spatial Justice (Case Study: 5 Regions-Urmia). Journal of Research and Urban Planning, 15(57), 1-16. doi: 10.30495/jupm.2022.29908.4122 [In Persian]
47.    Mushkani, R. (2025). Urban AI governance must embed legal reasonableness for democratic and sustainable cities. Journal of arXiv preprint, 1(2), 30-42. https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.12174
48.    Negahban Marvi, M., Eghbali, N., & Hataminejad, H. (2020). Explanation of the Iranian New Towns First Generation Management with approach Good Urban Governance from the Point of View of Country Subdivisions. Journal of Geography and Territorial Spatial Arrangement, 10(35), 1-26. doi: 10.22111/gaij.2020.5342 [In Persian]
49.    Pieri, A. (1999). Urban governance models in comparative perspective. Journal of Urban Affairs Review, 34(3), 341-369. https://doi.org/10.1177/10780879922184306
50.    Poorangha, I., Zaheri, M., & Roustaei, S. (2024). Feasibility Study of Good Urban Governance for Maku City. Journal of Arid Regions Geographic Studies, 15(3), 88-104. doi:10.22034/jargs.2023.373974.0 [In Persian]
51.    Rivero-Villar, A., & Vieyra Medrano, A. (2021). Governance for urban resilience in popular settlements in developing countries: a case-study review. Journal of Climate and Development, 14(3), 208–221. https://doi.org/10.1080/17565529.2021.1906203
52.    Rostaei, S., Ghorbani, R., & Bordbar, H. (2024). The future study of urban governance in the post-corona era Case study: Metropolis of Tabriz. Journal of Economic Geography Research, 4(3), 32-53. https://jurs.znu.ac.ir/article_712742.html?lang=fa [In Persian]
53.    Saidi, A. (2009). Encyclopedia of urban and rural management. Tehran: Organization of Municipalities and Rural Administrations of Iran Publications. [In Persian]
54.    Saraei, M.H., Shakarami, N., Anizh, H., & Kamandari, M. (2015). Evaluation and Analysis of Urban Management with Emphasis on Desirable Urban Governance Indices (Case Study: Khorramabad). Journal of Urban Social Geography, 1(1), 43-61. doi: 10.22103/juas.2015.1771 [In Persian]
55.    Sharifzadeh, E., Sheikhi, A., & Ajza Shokouhi, M. (2018). Assessment of good governance in the stability of urban neighborhoods of Piranshahr. Journal of Sustainable city, 1(3), 109-128. doi: 10.22034/jsc.2018.89876 [In Persian]
56.    Song, K. (2023). Urban Governance: A Review of Intellectual Structure and Topic Evolution. Journal of Cities & Urban Studies, 32(3),80-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ugj.2023.06.001
57.    Song, K., Chen, Y., Duan, Y., & Zheng, L. (2023). Urban governance: A review of intellectual structure and research trends. Journal of Urban Governance, 1(1), 105-112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ugov.2023.10500609
58.    Sulistyaningsih, T., Loilatu, M.J., & Roziqin, A. (2023). Research trends on smart urban governance in Asia: A bibliometric analysis. Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management, 15(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSTPM-03-2022-0045
59.    Talebi, M.A., Rahnemaei, M.T., & Ghorbaninezhad, R. (2021). Pathology of Barriers to Good Urban Governance in Middle Cities Case Study: Neyshabur City. Journal of Sustainable city, 3(4), 43-57. doi: 10.22034/jsc.2021.251270.1326 [In Persian]
60.    Tu, T.M., Nguyen, Q.H., Nguyen, P.N.D., Phan, H.H., Nguyen, P.K.L., & Mora, L. (2025). Governance of urban circular economy transition: A bibliometric analysis and future research directions. Journal of Circular Economy and Sustainability, 5(3), 1897–1921. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43615-025-00517-3
61.    United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs (UNDESA). (2023). Strategy note: Strengthening urban governance. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/376617146_Strategy_note_strengthening_urban_governance_Sep_2023
62.    Vakilian, H., Arghan, A., & Kamyabi, S. (2024). Modeling smart urban management: A new approach for good urban governance (Case study: Shahroud city). Journal of Geographical Engineering of Territory, 8(4), 65-86. https://doi.org/10.22034/jget.2023.418675.1513 [In Persian]
63.    World Health Organization (WHO). (2022). Initiative on urban governance for health and well-being. Retrieved from https://www.who.int/initiatives/urban-governance-for-health-and-well-being
64.    Xie, F., Liu, G., & Zhuang, T. (2021). A Comprehensive Review of Urban Regeneration Governance for Developing Appropriate Governance Arrangements. Journal of Land, 10(5), 545-555. https://doi.org/10.3390/land10050545
65.    Xu, Y., Cugurullo, F., Zhang, H., Gaio, A., & Zhang, W. (2024). The Emergence of Artificial Intelligence in Anticipatory Urban Governance: Multi-Scalar Evidence of China's Transition to City Brains. Journal of Urban Technology, 32(3), 9-33. https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2023.2292823
66.    Ziari, K., & Rostami, M. (2024). Prioritizing Iranian metropolises based on urban good governance indicators. Journal of Geography and Spatial Development, 1(2), 53-64. doi: 10.22098/gsd.2025.16500.1074 [In Persian]
جغرافیا و پژوهش های شهری
دوره 3، شماره 1
بهار 1405
صفحه 85-104

صفحه اصلی

راهنمای نویسندگان

ارسال مقاله

داوران

تماس با ما