Assessment of the status of urban space desirability components in Sarab

Document Type : Article extracted from the dissertation

Authors

1 Department of Geography and Urban Planning, Faculty of Humanities, University of Maragheh, Maragheh, Iran

2 Associate Professor, Department of Geography and Urban Planning, Faculty of Humanities, University of Maragheh, Maragheh, Iran.

3 Department of Geography, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Zanjan, Zanjan, Iran.

Abstract
With the emergence of multiple social, cultural, economic, physical, and environmental crises in cities across the world during the second half of the twentieth century the desirability of urban space, particularly in developing countries, has declined. Accordingly, in recent years this issue has become one of the most fundamental topics within the fields of human and environmental studies. The evaluation of urban space quality is undertaken not only on the basis of the objective environment but also according to individuals’ perceptions of the environment to which they belong. In this regard, the present study aims to assess the desirability of the urban space of Sarab. The research is applied in nature and employs a descriptive–analytical method. Data were collected through a survey using a questionnaire. Sarab has a population of approximately 45,031 people, and based on Cochran’s formula, 380 questionnaires were randomly distributed among citizens over 15 years of age. The research components include environmental (13 items), accessibility and comfort (14 items), aesthetics and identity representation (13 items), and security (10 items). SPSS software was used for data analysis, employing statistical tests including the one-sample t-test, one-way ANOVA, stepwise regression, and Tukey’s test. The findings reveal that the status of Sarab across all examined components—environmental (2.90), accessibility and comfort (2.49), aesthetics and identity representation (2.62), and security (2.94)—was below the average threshold, namely the value of 3. Regarding the research components, the results indicate that the security component, with a beta value of 0.179, carries relatively greater importance in shaping the desirability of urban spaces in Sarab, whereas the aesthetics and identity representation component, with a beta value of 0.060, holds the least significance. Overall, the urban space of Sarab does not exhibit a desirable condition in terms of desirability. Therefore, urban managers and planners in Sarab must, through proper and efficient management, take measures to enhance the desirability of urban space and thereby ensure the welfare, comfort, and security of citizens.

Keywords


1.       Alipour, R., Khademi, M., Senemari, M. M., & Rafieyan, M. (2012). Surveying Environment Quality Indicators in Detection of Interfering Priorities in the Deteriorated Fabric of Bandar Lengeh city. Journal of Bagh-e Nazar9(20), 13-22. [In Persian].
2.       Arzhangi, H., & Mohammadi, A. (2021). Evaluation of the urban environment quality; (Case Study: Region 4 of Ardabil City). Journal of Sustainable Development of Geographical Environment2(3), 1-18. doi: 10.52547/sdge.2.3.1. [In Persian].
3.       Bastani, S., & Malekipour, S. (2016). The effect of urban space to happiness of residents out of 9 districts in Tehran. Journal of Community Development (Rural-Urban)8(1), 1-26. doi: 10.22059/jrd.2016.61174. [In Persian]
4.       Bishop, K., & Marshall, D0 (2017). Social Interactions and the Quality of Urban Public Space. Journal of  Encyclopedia of Sustainable Technologies, 10(2), 63–70. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-409548-9.10177-0.
5.       Boroumand, M., Toghiani, S., & Saberi, H. (2019). Investigating the impact of urban space components on the formation of behavioral patterns (case study of Tehran Region 2). Journal of Environmental Planning, 12(47), 23-43. https://sid.ir/paper/373159/fa. [In Persian]
6.       Carmona, C., Heath, T. O., & Taner, T. S.(2003). Public Places, Urban Spaces, Architectural Press. New York: Paris. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780080515427
7.       Gholami, M., Saberi, H., Toghyani, S., & Shams, M. (2024). An Investigation into Desirable Urban Spaces and Its Role on Realization of the Theory of the Right to the City in Ahvaz Metropolis. Journal of GeoRes, 39 (2),129-138. http://georesearch.ir/article-1-1501-fa.html. [In Persian].
8.       Golkar, K. (2005). Guide to the landscape design phase in urban design. Journal of Fine Arts, 24(3), 25-36. [In Persian]
9.       Heydari, M. T., Rasoli, M., Sharifi, Z., & Moharrami, S. (2023). Explaining the desirability components of urban space in realizing the right to the city (Case study: Urmia). Journal of Human Geography Research55(3), 21-45. doi: 10.22059/jhgr.2022.340609.1008468. [In Persian].
10.    Hoseinianrad, A., & Molaei Qelichi, M. (2023). Investigating The Effect of Desirability of Urban Space Indices on The Realization of The Right to City (Case Study: Kashan). Environmant of Human Made Studies1(2), 199-221. doi: 10.30487/hmes.2023.1988258.1032. [In Persian]
11.    Khodayari Motlagh, S., Sharepour, M., & Tavallai, N. (2017). A study about the effect of desirability of urban space indicators on the realization of the right to city (the case study: Babolsar). Journal of Sociology of Social Institutions4(9), 189-225. doi: 10.22080/ssi.2017.1564. [In Persian]
12.    Kısar Koramaz, E., & Türkoğlu, H. (2018). Measuring and Understanding Urban Parks’ Contribution to Quality of Life in Istanbul. Journal of Social Indicators Research, 138(21), 335–351. doi:10.1007/s11205-017-1657-6.
13.    La Malva, F., Verso, V. R. L., & Astolfi, A.( 2015). Livingscape: a multi-sensory approach to improve the quality of urban spaces. Journal of Energy Procedia, 78(11), 37-42. doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2015.11.111
14.    Maroofi, S. (2020). Making appropriate of urban spaces for socio-cultural activities (case study: Bazaar of Tehran). Journal of Urban Design Discourse a Review of Contemporary Litreatures and Theories, 1(2), 109-117. [In Persian]
15.    Maroofi, S., & Bayazid, Q. (2021). Explaining and Analyzing the Stability of Community Spaces and Measuring the Effective Factors (A Case studyof Mahabad Family Park). Journal of Environmental based territorial planning (Amayesh), 13(51), 203-230. https://sid.ir/paper/391259/en. [In Persian]
16.    Nabizadeh Zolpirani, M., Azimi, N., & Mohammadpour, S. (2022). Assessing the quality of urban public spaces from social justice perspective (Case study of Rasht, Iran). Journal of Human Geography Research. 54(1). [In Persian]
17.    Omidiyan Kalashgarani, L., Saghafi Asl, A., Sattari Sarbangholi, H., & Faramarzi Asl, M. (2022). An Analysis of the Desirability of Social Functions of Urban Spaces: A Case Study on District 12 of Tehran Metropolis. Journal of Urban Structure and Function Studies9(31), 151-169. doi:10.22080/usfs.2022.22477.2197. [In Persian]
18.    Rafiei, A., Rezvani, I., & Karimi, M. (2013). Study of factors affecting the improvement of spatial quality of squares with an urban design approach. Journal of Tehran City Planning and Studies Center, 137(15). http://simkaco.pinfile.ir/file/8267. [In Persian]
19.    Rezaee, M., Tadayon, B., & Javanbakht Ghahfarokhi, M. (2023). Studying and evaluating of the desirability of urban spaces toward the psychic satisfaction of the elderly community the case study of Mellat Street, Shahrekord. Journal of Geographical Urban Planning Research (GUPR)11(3), 79-98. doi: 10.22059/jurbangeo.2023.361322.1838. [In Persian]
20.    Shaerepour, M., Tavallaei, N., & Eslami, A. (2019). The Evaluation of Desirability of Urban Public Spaces among the Youth (Case study: Ghaemshahr City). Journal of Studies of Human Settlements Planning, 14(3), 605-621. https://journals.iau.ir/article_667737.html. [In Persian]
21.    UN-Habitat. (2015). Global Public Space Toolkit: From Global Principles to Local Policies and Practice. Quality of Urban Life through Public Space.150. https://unhabitat.org.
22.    Wai Maa, K., MingMak, C., & Hai Ming, W. (2020). Effects of environmental sound quality on soundscape preference in a public urban space. Journal of Applied Acoustics, 171(17), 1-10. doi:10.1016/j.apacoust.2020.107570.